Kuithe v. Gulf Caribe Maritime, Inc.
Date Decided: August 26th, 2010
Originally Filed in: Alabama ()
Decided by: Alabama Southern District Court (Federal)
Court: S.D.Ala.
Judge: Steele
Citation: 2010 WL 3419998
Background:
Plaintiff, a seaman, sustained injuries when he fell from a ladder attached to a barge. As a result, the seaman needed a total knee replacement. The ladder's rungs were too close together, and there was an impediment in front of the ladder, which required the seaman to climb onto the ladder from a sharp angle. The seaman brought suit under the general maritime law and the Jones Act. The seaman claimed that the barge's ladder, and the positioning of the ladder on the barge created an unseaworthy condition. Allegedly, this unseaworthy condition was the cause of his injuries. Defendant, the seaman's employer, denied that the ladder was the cause. Instead, the defendant alleged that the plaintiff's own negligence caused his injury because the plaintiff concealed a pre-existing injury, a knee injury. Plaintiff sustained a torn ACL in his knee some years before his employment with the defendant. Defendant alleged that plaintiff's fall from the ladder was actually caused by plaintiff's bad knee giving out on the ladder.
Plaintiff, a seaman, sustained injuries when he fell from a ladder attached to a barge. As a result, the seaman needed a total knee replacement. The ladder's rungs were too close together, and there was an impediment in front of the ladder, which required the seaman to climb onto the ladder from a sharp angle. The seaman brought suit under the general maritime law and the Jones Act. The seaman claimed that the barge's ladder, and the positioning of the ladder on the barge created an unseaworthy condition. Allegedly, this unseaworthy condition was the cause of his injuries. Defendant, the seaman's employer, denied that the ladder was the cause. Instead, the defendant alleged that the plaintiff's own negligence caused his injury because the plaintiff concealed a pre-existing injury, a knee injury. Plaintiff sustained a torn ACL in his knee some years before his employment with the defendant. Defendant alleged that plaintiff's fall from the ladder was actually caused by plaintiff's bad knee giving out on the ladder.
Issues:
Does a pre-existing medical condition preclude a seaman from recovery when the pre-existing condition was a contributing factor to his injuries? And, is a seaman precluded from recovery if he conceals a pre-existing condition that contributes to his injury?
Does a pre-existing medical condition preclude a seaman from recovery when the pre-existing condition was a contributing factor to his injuries? And, is a seaman precluded from recovery if he conceals a pre-existing condition that contributes to his injury?
Held:
First, the court held that the defendant was negligent. The ladder and its positioning on the barge created an unseaworthy condition. Therefore, the issue of the pre-existing condition and its concealment is then addressed for the purpose of determining the Seaman's comparative fault. Concealment of a medical condition may be the basis for reducing the seaman's recovery, but only if the seaman does so knowingly. The court found that the seaman knowingly concealed the fact that his knee gave out from time to time. The court concluded, "By his concealment, the plaintiff exposed his body to a risk of re-injury or aggravation and ultimately suffered precisely that." The court found the seaman 20% negligent, and reduced his recovery appropriately. (Except that the court granted the seaman the full amount of his maintenance and cure).
First, the court held that the defendant was negligent. The ladder and its positioning on the barge created an unseaworthy condition. Therefore, the issue of the pre-existing condition and its concealment is then addressed for the purpose of determining the Seaman's comparative fault. Concealment of a medical condition may be the basis for reducing the seaman's recovery, but only if the seaman does so knowingly. The court found that the seaman knowingly concealed the fact that his knee gave out from time to time. The court concluded, "By his concealment, the plaintiff exposed his body to a risk of re-injury or aggravation and ultimately suffered precisely that." The court found the seaman 20% negligent, and reduced his recovery appropriately. (Except that the court granted the seaman the full amount of his maintenance and cure).
Comments:
Concealment of a medical condition may be the basis for reducing the seaman's recovery, but only if the seaman does so knowingly.
Concealment of a medical condition may be the basis for reducing the seaman's recovery, but only if the seaman does so knowingly.
<< PREVNEXT >>
